Wanted to resurface this, because it’ll reduce a (guaranteed) tornado in months/years ahead.
Aligning on goals. To help ensure that there’s cohesive decision making, and less deliberation.
// Random examples to articulate my point //
Short term (<18 months) : "We are prioritizing new CDP creation from unique wallets, as opposed to growing the market cap of Dai. We feel that planting this groundwork while we’re still early from McD, and collateral selection remains to be finalized, the most value is to bring more and more CDP’s into the picture. In the future, this base has better changes to be more distributed in accessibility. Some markets can appreciate it much more, and the more knowledgable and active CDP users there are, the faster we get to reach these markets that can take advantage of it.
Medium term (3-5 years) : "We wanted new CDP’s at first, because that was to plant a base of educated users, that will help others understand faster, while also having a large count of CDP’s can allow for a broad distribution where Dai can be drawn down.
Long term (5-7+ years) : Create a global currency that is supported by the participants and not a select few. Ensuring stability, borderless distribution. Delivering much needed financial services, for underbanked in established economies and unbanked in 3rd world countries. Decentralized, distributed, borderless. Fair.