So is this a Collaboration or a Partnership?
There is a level of Maker stuff that is open, and another level that is completely NDA and closed. The open stuff is easy to review, the closed not so much.
Help me out here on some of the details of this collaboration.
What ‘notes’ will be shared?
Who benefits from this ‘developing robust frameworks’?
Who is paying for what here?
And some of the larger questions. Who is bringing what to the table, to give and get what?
The bigger question will be how is stuff that falls under the RWA Maker NDA’s going to be quarantined in such a collaboration?
Thinking about this from say a 6s or Centrifuge point of view. If I spent a ton of money to create a legal structure I am not going to want collaborators to just look in and basically take all this work and then start using it themselves. In the loosest sense the legal documentation structures themselves are paid for and owned by the entities constructing them. Just because they give the DAO an open look into them doesn’t mean someone else gets the rights to just copy and paste them. At 1-2K/hr or higher I expect these structures cost a lot of money to create and I’d hate to see a collaborator basically taking everything our partners have done legally and basically using these structures to compete against us somehow.
I guess what I don’t want to see is entities who are getting access to the legal IP being constructed basically being able to ‘fork’ via a copy-paste without compensating or negotiating agreements with those paying to construct these and making them open to MakerDAO/public.
Is there going to be a non-compete agreement signed here?