Thank you to all those that took the time to participate in our survey about RWF assessment sections. We are eager to keep improving and providing the most value to the community.
This poll was intended as a way to capture the community’s thoughts on what sections are most or least useful in our analysis, measured as:
- I’d like more focus on
- I’d like less focus on
- I sit on the fence
Results
For the purposes of this survey the team is interpreting “more of” vs “less of” results in terms of greater detail wanted vs more conciseness in a section of our due diligence.
Globally response cross sections remains positive but has room for improvement (+ 60% of votes “more of”)
Highlights:
- Community clearly wishes greater focus on 5 sections of assessment (+ 2/3 of voters)
- Exec Summary, AO analysis, Risk levels, Lend process
- Four sections of assessment don’t seem to have greater appeal, given either neutral or negative view by respondents (+1/2 of voters)
- A clear winner the community wants greater focus is on “Executive Summaries” for RWA assessments
Unfortunately, given little extra qualitative data to assess poll results, we cannot interpret them much further. But we’re open to feedback anytime.
Last, we have taken your feedback and reworked our due diligence templates and documentation. We are sharpening our pencils to deliver some nice Exec Summaries and improved assessments ;).
Thanks all
The RWF team:
@SebVentures
@Philinje
@williamr
